0/0

C.A. 7125/98 Mifromal Industries Jerusalem v. Klil Industries Ltd.

The Supreme Court set a precedent upon holding that differences between the alleged infringing product and the registered Design do not suffice for concluding non- infringement. While examining the question of infringement the overall impression should be taken into account. When applying the “eye test”, differences in details should not be examined with a “magnifying glass”.
 
PDF VERSION