ADI LEVITATTORNEYS AT LAW HE
עדי לויטעורכי דין EN
SELECTED MATTER

Merck —
Fosalan

Patent Application 153109 · once-weekly alendronate dosing

Unipharm and Teva opposed Merck’s patent application concerning once-weekly administration of alendronate.

THE PROCEEDINGS

A technically and evidentially intensive patent opposition.

The opposition involved extensive scientific and legal evidence concerning pharmaceutical dosing and patentability. The hearing extended over twelve full days of witness and expert examinations, with a substantial evidentiary record.

The case also addressed the patentability of dosage-regimen claims and inventive step in the context of a known pharmaceutical compound.

OUTCOME

The opposition was accepted and the application was refused.

On 5 August 2010, the Patent Registrar held that the application was not patentable. Merck’s appeal to the District Court was dismissed, and its subsequent application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was also dismissed. The Supreme Court endorsed the use of the ‘obvious to try’ framework in assessing inventive step and reiterated that appellate intervention in the Patent Registrar’s factual and professional findings should be limited.

Israel Patent Office Opposition to Patent Application 153109 · decision of 5 August 2010 Read decision (PDF) →
District Court Administrative Appeal 35096-09-10 Read District Court judgment (PDF) →
Supreme Court LCA 6837/12 Read Supreme Court decision (PDF) →